```c
/**
comment one
*/
/**
comment two
*/
/**
comment three
*/
```
is just not as readable as:
```c
/**
* comment one
* comment two
* comment three
*/
```
These would still parse and would generate _stuff_, but the generated
stuff is just not ideal yet. So better not accept them, until their
internal support has matured.
Previously, the tokenizer had horrendous errors when lexing raw literal
strings. These have been removed. The remaining issue still persists,
that empty doc comments are serialized in c in a _weird_ way. They
should be merged.
The rust based test were both not sufficient to cover all edge-cases and
so unmaintainable that they nearly always didn't even compile. This new
test framework should alleviate both concerns.
However, one big problem still remains: it does not support test cases
that should fail, so these have just been left in the `./tests`
directory.
This might be a big diff, but I _hope_ that it does not change much
functionally (hopefully it changes nothing generation specific).
What has changed?
-----------------
- I had to merge the three crates into one, to allow `macros` to impl
functions on Types defined in `parser`.
- As mentioned in the point above, the conversion function are now
inherent to the type they convert (i. e. `r#type.to_rust()` instead of
`type_to_rust(r#type)`).
- The conversion function have been sorted, by what they convert to:
- `to_rust()` converts a type to be used in rust *host* code.
- `to_c()` converts a type to be used in c *host* code.
- `to_auxiliary_c()` converts a type to be used in c *auxiliary*
code.
- The top-most `generate` method of `TrixyConfig` now returns a
`FileTree` instead of writing the files directly. The `FileTree` can
still be materialize with the `materialize` method. But this change
facilitates moving non-generation focused code out of the `generate`
method.
What is the difference between _host_ and _auxiliary_ code?
-----------------------------------------------------------
Auxiliary code is always written in the language it is generated for. So
auxiliary code for c would be written in c (or at least in a subset of c),
as it represents c header files.
Host code is always written in rust. This is the code that is
responsible for implementing the actual ffi stuff. In our case these are
the `extern "C"` functions and the types, defined in trixy.
The rust host code is generating the native rust representations of
these types.
This error should only ever be raised, when we encountered a bug.
This change notifies the user, that the situation is rather likely to be
a bug and that this should be reported.
Errors were contextualized by finding their index in the source file.
This method is extremely flaky, as it _hopes_ that the line is not
spread over multiple lines.
The new method actually uses the span to calculate a matched line and
thus avoids any issues related to the actual position of the line in the
source file.
Notably these diverge from rust, by requiring argument names. This is a
deliberate design decision, as it help users to guess what's going to be
passed into their callback.
Benedikt Peetz